Support the chances

But in these countries there is also a lot of potential. To name a few I could start with the human resources in its youth. Not all but many young people are eager and willing to work very hard and invest in themselves. Besides their majors they speak one or two extra languages next to their mother tongue.

The robust educational system and more specifically the beta studies are another asset. In comparison to The Netherlands young people still enroll in these studies.

Furthermore I think that our Western products shouldn’t automatically replace the traditions of homegrown food and honest recipes and some of the traditional products. Is the EU influence only based on streamlining food security from the viewpoint of risk prevention and quality control? Or can it also leave space for the traditions of these countries, that might not have given them very high product efficiency, but certainly better tasting fruits and veggies, plus the tradition to use everything and to throw away nothing. Earlier, I wrote about complaining Dutch citizens, because the plumb trees planted in their streets were polluting their cars and attracted wasps. In the countries I visited nobody needs to die of hunger in summer and autumn, because fruit and nut trees, vegetables in the fields, can provide for all. Here the people are much closer to nature and its products than in Northwestern Europe. Their tradition and our so-called ‘slow-food’ and honest homegrown products could be combined.

However is it possible to keep these chances intact? Or will the patterns of change, like I saw them in the nineties in Poland and the Baltic States, repeat itself? A total wipe out of their traditional products by the multinational giants, like for instance Coca Cola, Pepsi, Unilever, Nestlé etc. and with the by-effect of an enormous aluminum, metal and plastic pollution, because their products are coming into a market where people have no or very small awareness of environmental effects of throwing away plastic bottles for example.

Why don’t we support these countries from the very beginning and start environmental awareness campaigns, with heavy duties for these multinationals, alongside the inevitable economic equalization process?

I am not an expert on the talks and negotiations that these countries go through in the stages of preparation for EU-admittance. But I hope that from the evaluation of the joining of CIS countries these lessons and insights are seriously used and applied. I believe that it would be good for them and also for us, since we have lost so much on our way to ‘progress’ that we only regretted after the losses were almost irreparable. That shouldn’t have to happen again. That would be a shame I think.

Personally, I have ‘tasted’ enough of these countries and people to most certainly bring me back there. Definitely in my free time, but maybe also in my professional time, using my previous experiences and try to fit these to our mutual benefits.

Looking back on this six week trip

From being alone, I being the only one responsible for my actions, decisions and their consequences, my successes and failures, I am back now into the world with my wife, children, family, friends and responsibilities. This needs some time for adjustment and I knew this beforehand, but there is a difference of knowing it and the real thing.

Of course during these six weeks on my own, I did not live like a hermit. I also like company. I am not the loner type. This trip, that didn’t give a single negative experience at all, made me realize that the confrontation of other people from a positive point of view of trust and wonderment without doubt and suspicion, feels good. It proofed also more productive in getting into some form of communication, even if the spoken languages did not match. And traveling through the Balkan as a West European this will often be the case. This lesson, I will bring to mind after my sabbatical.

How old is 55?

The other element, I was not quite sure of, was if at my age of 55, travel companions, hosts and people in the street you just encounter with a question, would not find me odd, a loner on his bicycle. As far as I can judge it by my experiences, people never gave me that feeling. Maybe that is because on a bicycle you are so much more approachable than for instance in a private car. Maybe because they also are astonished and curious, that could very well be. But this expected disapproval was never there and that gave an enormous reassurance and a lot of confidence in myself. It just was what I hoped it to be, a social and societal adventure into countries and cultures, that I never visited before and in which I had no experience. I consider this as another of the many treasures, I will cherish and nourish forever.

Between disillusion and hope

Another element of this trip, touring specifically the former communistic countries Hungary, Slovenia, Serbia, Bosnia Hercegovina, Montenegro, Croatia and Albania, that will stay with me is a mixed feeling, one of hope and positivism and contrarily despair and disillusion.

I imagined myself as a young man, no job, and no incentive from parents to educate oneself as best as possible. The further South I came, the more you see the young men hanging around, trying to distinguish themselves from all the others, but ending up doing all the same. Drink a coffee and smoke like their fathers and grandfathers, being very serious about their mobile and some about their twenty year old smoke cuffing VW Golf. Of course they would like to work, start a family but how can they? There are just no jobs, although there is work enough! But they can’t see – what I see – because they lack examples, role models, a little push, some appreciation and trust. Going abroad, as only the bravest do, doesn’t really help, because all their energy is encountered by us in the established part of the EU with mistrust, envy and fear. And if you are Serbian or Albanian you can’t legally work anywhere in the EU.

But despite all this negativism there are also bright spots of hope. I do not know if my observation is blurred by the interest in the other sex, but it seems to be that in these societies the girls and women are the most studious and diligent. They seem not so busy with their appearance and their own presence amongst their peers. They seem more communicative and open. Asking a question on the street to a young men or women made a difference. The men more often turned me down, or told me they did not understand me, than the women.

Of course you also meet well-educated men and women, both eager to get ahead. Both targeted and knowing what they are or want to be doing. But making a comparison between the young people I spoke to in Hungary and for instance in Albania, the ones in Hungary – although with the strong intention to work in their country – seem disappointed. They told me they feel they can’t ‘stick their heads through the ceiling’. It’s the power structure of the old Hungary, ruled by the clan of former communists, now often turned into nationalists and strong believers in the status quo that pushes and keeps them down.

In Albania there seemed to be more hope and less disillusion. They still see a future for themselves in which their time will come, where the Hungarians are looking abroad to at least give their enthusiasm and energy a chance to blossom.I have no explanation for these differences in the atmospheres.

What can we do?

If we believe in the European Union as not only an economic entity, but also a pacifying and levering vehicle, bringing us all a more stable and better future, what can we do to make this a reality?  

I wrote earlier that one of most successful models to build up mutual trust, companionship and communication channels is through person – to – person relationships at different levels of society. Private initiatives of exchange, like teachers to teachers, schools to schools,  cooperation and relationships between craftsmen, SME's, municipal workers willing to share their experiences, are powerful tools of change. I belief that this policy should be built up at EU-level, but without the money factor playing a significant role. This would only attract the wrong people on both ends and would lead to an early death, because of the killing red tape. Because ‘not going by the book’ is one of the rules in these countries. Therefore some flexibility and time is badly needed. Otherwise there will be smart local politicians, banning smoking in all bars, restaurants and workplaces, according to EU-regulations, just for the record and their shiny exposure. Still I could not find one of these places living up to it!

The often heart argument that this would only lead to spilling ‘our’ communal (EU) funds and to misuse, because these societies are so corrupt, is up for debate. Our Western definition of corruption just takes into account if something is legal or illegal. But shouldn’t the final results of an activity – take for example the postbox constructions of the Netherlands – not be part of the definition as well? We don’t call it corrupt, but these tax constructions certainly do not appreciate the losses to our national budget. These revenues never become part of it, because we allow some firms these legal constructions. But for me that’s just as corrupt as we tend to stamp the societies of the Southern parts of Europe and the Balkans with. This is not a plea to keep intact the nepotism, the arbitrariness, the insecurity of legal protection of basic human rights, like freedom of speech and sexual orientation. On the contrary, this should change, but the question is how can we do this most effectively, efficient and are we willing to look critically at our own ingrained and established methods and instruments?

TO BE CONTINUED!